Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ind. 115

Welch v. Watts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1857

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1857-05-28

Suit by the assignee of a promissory note against the maker. Answer, failure of consideration. Reply, putting the cause at issue. Trial by jury. Verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial on the ground that the Court had not given the instructions to the jury, asked for by the plaintiff. The motion was overruled, and the plaintiff excepted. Judgment on the verdict.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-05-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1943

4 state decisions

101857186018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1By the statute (2 R. S. p. 110, subs. 5), the Court is bound to instruct the jury, unless the parties consent to dispense with instructions.

¶2A promissory note is, prima fade, sufficient evidence to justify the entry of judgment against the maker, in a suit on the note; and, to defeat such judgment, in such suit, the maker, defendant, must establish, to the satisfaction of the jury, a legal defense to the note. No defense, whatever, was proved in this case.

¶3The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial.

/9/ind/115 · .json · Public domain