Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ind. 322

Shroyer v. Lawrence

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1857

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1857-06-08

<p>An appeal cannot be taken to the Supreme Court, by agreement of parties, before final judgment.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-06-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1892

4 state decisions

2018571860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Lawrence sued Shroyer upon an account consisting of various items, which, in the aggregate, amount to 231 dollars. There was a demurrer to the complaint overruled.' The defendant then filed an answer containing two paragraphs. A demurrer was sustained to the first, and to the second there was a reply, to which the defendant demurred; but his demurrer was overruled. At this stage of the proceedings the parties filed an agreement which is set forth in the record, and is as follows:

It is agreed, &c., that the defendant may appeal to the Supreme Court from the decisions already made in said cause by this Court, with the same rights as if final judgment had been rendered in the cause, and that all further proceedings therein in this Court shall be stayed, and said cause shall be continued until the decision of the Supreme Court, on the questions presented, shall be certified, &c.; and that further proceedings in this cause, in this Court, shall depend upon, and be governed by, the decision of the Supreme Court therein.”

¶2Upon the filing of the above agreement, the Court, in accordance therewith, ordered the case to be continued, &e.

¶3The code says, “ Appeals may be taken from the Courts of Common Pleas and Circuit Courts to the Supreme Court, by either party, from all final judgments.” 2 R. S. p. 158. This rule of procedure at once shows that the case made by the record is not properly before us. In addition to the objection that there is no final judgment, it may be assumed that the appellate jurisdiction of this Court can, in no instance, be conferred by the agreement of parties.

Ii. Hill, for the appellant.W. Herod and S. Stansifer, for the appellee.

¶4Let the appeal be dismissed with costs.

/9/ind/322 · .json · Public domain