Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ind. App. 296

Hatfield v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1894

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1894-02-24

<p>From the Ohio Circuit Court.</p>

Relies on Johns v. State · Weir v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-02-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1971

14 state decisions

40189419001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Dissenting Opinion.

Gavin, J.

¶2Upon the authority of Johns v. State, 104 Ind. 557, and Weir v. State, 115 Ind. 210, and R. S. 1894, section 1964, which provides that “In the consideration of the questions which are presented upon an appeal, the Supreme Court shall not regard technical errors or defects or exceptions to any decision or action in the court below, which did not, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant,” I am of the opinion that when the record shows that a defendant has actually gone to trial upon *305the merits of the charge, and presented his defense fully to the trial court, the judgment ought not to be reversed because the clerk has failed to enter his plea of record. The record shows affirmatively that he obtained, upon the trial, the full benefit of a plea of not guilty, and this •court should, in the absence of an affirmative showing to the contrary, presume that the plea was made. •

¶3For these reasons, I believe this cause should be transferred to the Supreme Court, with a recommendation to overrule the cases holding the contrary.

¶4Filed Feb. 24,1894.

/9/indapp/296 · .json · Public domain