V-R’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1305 (§ 265 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1306 (§ 266 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Bulova Watch Co. v. United States · Bufalino v. Holland · Ntovas v. Ahrens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.