9 Kan. App. 2d 353 - State v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2000
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad · In Re the Attorney General, Stephan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The facts of this case show only that the trial judge’s son was on the staff of the Sedgwick County district attorney’s office as an assistant district attorney during die pendency of diis action. The facts do not support any finding whatsoever diat the defendant’s right to a fair trial was impeded, infringed upon, or denied by die connection here disclosed. We find that defendant was not prejudiced in any way, and his sentence and conviction should not be set aside on this ground.” 9 Kan. App. 2d at 355 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Logan · In Re Lucas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.