9 Kan. App. 2d 728 - State v. Latimer’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Bowman (1993), State v. Bowman (1993)
3 federal appellate · 14 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · City of Dayton v. Rogers · State v. Huffman · State Ex Rel. Murray v. Palmgren · State v. Boos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[defendant's] false identity was given in response to a direct question by a police officer during the course of a criminal investigation”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Obstructing legal process or official duty is knowingly and willfully obstructing, resisting or opposing any person authorized by law to serve process in the service or execution or in the attempt to serve or execute any writ, warrant, process or order of the court, or in the discharge of any official duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“supplied a plausible name and address to the 9 officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goodro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.