¶1Opinion by
¶2In order to maintain an action in equity to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, it is in general requisite that the creditor shall have a judgment at law, and a return of nulla bona upon his common-law execution.
¶3If V. C. Pearce were alive, a judgment against him and a return of no property would be necessary to enable appellees to reach the estate conveyed by Combs to his heirs at law. As he is dead, the appellees should either show that they have such judgment and return against his personal representative, or else that he has no personal representative. The last fact would of itself authorize an appeal to the chancellor.
¶4If the appellees are seeking to reach the land, an estate descended to the appellants, then they should follow the provisions of the General Statutes. They may have a judgment in personam in a joint action in ordinary against the personal representatives and heirs at law, as provided by Sec. 6, Art. i, Chap. 44, General Statutes, or if there be no personal representative, then they may proceed in equity against the heirs alone, .and in such action, they may, by proper procedure and upon legal grounds, secure a lien on the property descended, and not disposed of.
¶5In this case, they are proceeding against the heirs at law without joining the personal representative, and without averring that there is no such representative. As the heirs at law have the right to have the debt satisfied out of the personal assets of their ancestor, if he left any, the proceedings herein had are erroneous. Hagan v. Patterson, 10 Bush 441; Conley’s Heirs v. Boyle’s Ex’rs, 6 T. B. Mon. 639.
¶6Judgment reversed and cause remanded with instructions to allow appellees to amend their petition and for further proper proceedings.