Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 La. Ann. 463

Vincent v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1854

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1854-06-15

<p>A personal action for damages for a tort, does not expire with the person who instituted the action. C. P. 1, 21, 22, 118, 120, 90T. O. C. 86T, 1994, 22T1, 2294.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1854-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1979

6 state decisions

201854186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Buchanan, J.

¶1The verdict of the jury in this case, condemned the defendant to pay one hundred dollars damages for an assault and battery upon the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed, and the plaintiff’s counsel prays that the damages be increased. Two witnesses prove the assault and battery, and their evidence is entirely uncontradicted. The defendant was a young and vigorous man; the plaintiff old and feeble.

¶2Since the appeal, the plaintiff has died ; and the curator of his estate has been made party.

¶3It is insisted, by the counsel of appellant, that a personal action for damages for a tort, expires with the person who instituted it. We are not aware of any such rule in our jurisprudence. See Code of Practice, Articles 1, 21, 22, 113, 120. Also Civil Code, Articles 86T, 1994, 2271, 2294.

¶4We think this a proper case for the application of Article 907 of the Code of Practice, under the prayer of appellee, for an increase of damages.

¶5It is therefore decreed, that the judgment be affirmed, with ton dollars damages, as for a frivolous appeal, and costs in both courts.

/9/laann/463 · .json · Public domain