Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Mass. App. Ct. 644

Goldstein v. Barron

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 2, 1980

Massachusetts Appeals Court · decided 1980-05-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1995

2 state decisions

Relies on Austin v. Boston University Hospital · 8 Mass. App. Ct. 270 - Hanley v. Polanzak

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hale, C.J.

¶1(dissenting). I do not agree with part 1 of the opinion. The report of the tribunal was docketed and copies of it sent to the parties on February 20, 1979. The thirty-day period within which to file a bond started to run at that time. Hanley v. Polanzak, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 270, 273 (1979). “Section 60B is clear that, if the bond is not posted within thirty days of the tribunal’s finding the action shall be dismissed.” Austin v. Boston University Hosp., 372 Mass. 654, 661 (1977). I would reverse the orders denying the motions to dismiss and order the entry of judgments for the defendants.

/9/massappct/644 · .json · Public domain