Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 MASSAPPCT 919 - King v. Stephens

King v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2012

4 state decisions

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Community National Bank v. Dawes · Gillespie v. Rogers · O'Meara v. Gleason · Sykes v. Keating

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A deed is considered to be recorded when it is noted by the recording officer as having been received for recording, if the recording officer ‘places upon it his certificate that it has been so received, even though he afterwards fails in his duty by recording it inaccurately ... or even by altogether suppressing it from the records, yet in contemplation of law the whole world has constructive notice of it, just the same as if it had been accurately copied in full upon the records.’ Gillespie v. Rogers, 146 Mass. 610, 612 (1888).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.