Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Md. App. 317 - McChan v. State

9 Md. App. 317 - McChan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Escobedo v. Illinois · Schmerber v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court found that the motion had been ruled on by a court of competent jurisdiction and that it would not entertain the motion because ‘the matter has already been ruled on.’ We agree that the trial court was not obliged to hear and determine the motion to suppress the identification evidence which had already been fully heard and determined.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.