9 Md. App. 546 - Harnish v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2005
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 2 Md. App. 312 - Reckard v. State · 6 Md. App. 581 - Smith v. State · 5 Md. App. 599 - Hall v. State · People v. Bonneau · 3 Md. App. 231 - Austin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * It cannot be said that this was a declaration or utterance so contemporaneous in time and place as to have been made under the ‘immediate spur’ of the event or a continuing part of the transaction which had occurred eleven days before. Rather, it was ‘a narrative of a completed event’, given under circumstances and conditions where there had been ample time and opportunity to reflect upon and report the event. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.