Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 MICH 264 - Stadler v. Moors

Stadler v. Moors’s Empirical Analysis

1861

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1910
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1910

5 state decisions

20186118701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Horton v. Auchmoody · Kimball v. Mack · Hunt v. Wickwire & Foot · Proudfit v. Henman & Henman · Kilmore v. Sudam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ Though the justice might have held the cause open for a reasonable time, and continued the cause from day to'day,- in the progress of the trial, as the necessities of the case might require, he. had no right, without any such necessity, and without entering upon the trial, to adjourn it over for several days."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.