Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Misc. 209

Mehrbach v. Partridge

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1894

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1894-06-15

<p>A summons issued by the City Court of New York can only be served in said city, and the court obtains no jurisdiction by a service elsewhere. Irregularities in the service of a summons cannot be waived by any act of the defendant after entry of the judgment.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1957

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Newburger, J.

¶1This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made by defendant to set aside a judgment entered .herein and the order for the examination of defendant in proceedings supplementary to execution.

¶2It is claimed by defendant and conceded by counsel for the respondent on the argument that the service of the summons was made on the defendant in the county of Westchester.

¶3It is well settled that-a summons issued by this court can only be served in the city of Hew York, and, therefore, the service on the defendant was a nullity, and this court had no jurisdiction.

¶4It is claimed, however, by the respondent that the defendant yaived the defect in the service by his appearance before the referee in the supplementary proceedings.

¶5Irregularities in the service of a summons can only be waived prior to the entry of a judgment, either by appearance in person or by attorney, or by the service of an answer or demurrer.

¶6This court has held that even the obtaining of an extension of time to answer is not a sufficient appearance on the part of defendant to operate as a waiver of the irregularities in. .the *210service of the summons and to confer jurisdiction. Bell v. Good, 46 N. Y. St. Repr. 572.

¶7It is conceded that the defendant did not appear, either in person or by attorney, prior to the entry of the judgment, and no act of his subsequent to the entry of the judgment could confer jurisdiction on this court.

¶8The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed and the motion to vacate judgment and order in supplementary proceedings granted, with costs of -this appeal.

¶9Conlan, J., concurs.

¶10Order reversed and motion granted, with costs.

/9/misc/209 · .json · Public domain