Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Misc. 2d 739 - People v. Raso

9 Misc. 2d 739 - People v. Raso’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Presser v. State of Illinois · People v. . Persce · English v. State · People v. Spillman · Hampton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . .The purpose of all concealment statutes is clear. At the time they were enacted, the open carrying of weapons upon the person, was not prohibited. The purpose of the concealed weapons statutes was to prevent men in sudden quarrel or in the commission of crime from drawing concealed weapons and using them without prior notice to their victims that they were armed. The person assailed or attacked would behave one way if he knew his assailant was armed and perhaps another way if he could safely presume that he was unarmed. ” (Emphasis in the original)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.