Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Mo. 266

Palmer v. Crane

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1845

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1845-07-15

1. The declaration is defective. Admitting all the facts set forth, the plaintiff is not injured, because be was not prevented from prosecuting his suit by the alleged acts of the defendant, and he has no right to have the property levied upon, applied to the satisfaction o' his demand, until he has established it by the judgment of the court. See points made in this case, 8 Mo. R.p. 620-1.

Decided 1845-07-15

McBride, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This cause was in this court at the last July term, when the matters, of error then complained of, were fully examined, considered and decided by the court. The writ of error was dismissed because a formal judgment had not been entered on the demurrers. The judgment has been amended, whilst the errors remain uncorrected, hence the cause has again been brought to this court. On a re-argument we see no cause for overruling the decision heretofore made. 8 vol. Mo. Rep. 619. We are fully satisfied that the declaration is good and the pleas clearly bad. Judge Scott concurring herein, the judgment of the circuit courtis reversed and the cause remanded.

/9/mo/266 · .json · Public domain