Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Mo. 711

Boyd v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1846

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1846-01-15

The point relied upon by the plaintiffs, is, that the court ought to have given both the instructions asked for by the plaintiffs. The mortgage deed being the instrument sued upon, and being read in evidence to the court without any objections, was not only good evidence, but the very best that could have been offered; and the court in deciding that it was not sufficient to warrant a verdict for the plaintiffs, violated the plainest principle of evidence.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1883

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1846-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Scott, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This was a petition to foreclose a mortgage by the appellants against the appellee, who filed several pleas to the suit. They were all either stricken out or overruled, and it appears the cause was then submitted to the court, although there was no issue. The mortgage was read? and the plaintiff asked the court to declare the law to be, that he was entitled to recover. The court refused to do so and the plaintiff excepted, and took a non-suit, and after an unsuccessful motion to set it aside, appealed to this court.

¶3There being no plea in the cause, the truth of the petition stood admitted, and it was the duty of the court to have entered judgment by default, for want of a plea, and to have assessed the damages immediately; no writ of enquiry being necessary, as the damages were liquidated by the instrument sued on.

¶4The other Judges concurring the judgment will be reversed, and th© cause remanded»

/9/mo/711 · .json · Public domain