Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Neb. Ct. App. 453 - Pool v. Pool

9 Neb. Ct. App. 453 - Pool v. Pool’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Groseth v. Groseth · Welch v. Welch · Schulze v. Schulze · Elsome v. Elsome · Hajenga v. Hajenga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`typical' weekend, holiday, and summer visitation rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.