Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Neb. Ct. App. 834 - Walker v. Walker

9 Neb. Ct. App. 834 - Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Kelly · Ritter v. Ritter · Davidson v. Davidson · Reichert v. Reichert · Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a device to fairly and reasonably divide marital estates where the prime asset in contention is one spouse's gifted or inherited stock or property in a family agriculture organization”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.