Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Neb. Ct. App. 994 - Grams v. Grams

9 Neb. Ct. App. 994 - Grams v. Grams’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2020

8 state decisions

50200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 179

Relies on Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk · Kalkowski v. Kalkowski · Heald v. Heald · Tyler v. Tyler · Shockley v. Shockley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Tracing property is generally an unworkable proposition because the parties have a tendency to suggest tracing only when there is an improvement in value. Although some courts find a justifiable reason for limited tracing of prior owned property, it is not error to restrict the credit to the identical property which is retained during the marriage or to the value of the property at the time of the marriage or when disposed of during the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It has been a longstanding rule that when awarding property in a dissolution of marriage, property acquired by one of the parties through gift or inheritance ... which property is readily identifiable and traceable to that party, ordinarily is set off to the individual receiving the inheritance or gift and is not considered a part of the marital estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.