Brueckmann v. Frignoca’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1992
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dale v. Irwin · Matter of Goodman · Clark v. Robinson · 1 E.H. Smith 117 - Matter of Garvey · Cadwalader v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The residence required in the laws of this state, to entitle a person to vote at an election, means his fixed domicile or permanent home; and is not changed or altered by his occasional absence, with or without his family, if it be animo revertendi. A residence in law, once obtained, continues without intermission until a new one is gained.’ Cadwalader v. Howell, 18 N. J. L. 138. “ ‘Persons who are in hospital for the purpose of obtaining medical treatment do not thereby obtain a residence in such hospital so as to entitle them to be registered as living or residing therein. The purpose is a temporary one, and no residence can thereby be acquired.’ 10 Am. & Eng. Enoyl. L. p. 601.” (9 N. J. Misc., at page 129)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perri v. Kisselbach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.