Burley v. Barnhard’s Empirical Analysis
1887
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1895
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“•‘The claim of the plaintiff was not derived through her husband. It is for services which she performed for the deceased on her sole and separate account, which she had the right to do under the statute, and consequently Edwin Burley was not an interested party, and prohibited from testifying under section 829 of the Code of Civil Procedure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lashaw v. Croissant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.