9 Ohio App. 2d 210 - Jones v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The evil sought to be prevented by the application of this rule to civil actions generally is manifest, and there appears to be no valid reason to remove its application from Workmen's Compensation cases. On the contrary, the issue in such cases should be resolved objectively upon the evidence presented in the trial court through the exercise of independent judgment and without the overhanging influence of any previous decision. The parties enter the trial court upon equal footing, and Section 4123.519, Revised Code, does not contemplate that either party should be relegated to the laboriously fatiguing task of trying to overcome two adverse rulings upon the same claim." Id. at 212 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Vinson v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation

2. ““1. The appeal of a workmen’s compensation claimant under Section 4123.519, Revised Code, contemplates a new trial in the Court of Common Pleas. “2. It is prejudicial error for the trial court, on such appeal, to refer, in its general charge to the jury, to the previous denial by the Administrator of the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation of the ‘specific claim now at issue,’ and to the affirmance by the Board of Review of such denial.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 15 Ohio App. 2d 109 - Valentino v. Keller