9 Ohio App. 2d 327 - In Re Appropriation’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1996
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 34 Ohio App. 532 - Ohio Public Service Co. v. Dehring · State ex rel. Royal v. City of Columbus · 47 Ohio App. 399 - Colonial Furniture Co. v. Cleveland Union Terminals Co. · 6 Ohio App. 2d 6 - In Re Appropriation of Easements for Highway Purposes · Naftzger v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“<<# # # j]very element that can fairly enter into the question of value, and which an ordinarily prudent business man would consider before forming judgment in making á purchase, enters into the determination of market value, and thereby into the determination of damages. * # *””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““There is substantial authority that when there is an actual partial take of private property for a public use, which public use creates elements of personal annoyance and inconvenience such as set forth in the foregoing instruction, which particularly affect the market value of the residue of the property, such elements may be considered in determining the market value of the residue and indirectly the damages thereto. * * *” Id. at 331 , 38 O.O.2d at 387 , 224 N.E.2d at 543 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In determining damages to be awarded in this case, you can take into consideration every element of inconvenience, danger, noise, fear and interference with enjoyment and use of home and business, and disadvantage resulting from the maintenance of the non-access highway which will influence any intended purchaser’s estimate of the market value of such property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.