Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Ohio App. 2d 74 - Ryan v. MacKolin

9 Ohio App. 2d 74 - Ryan v. MacKolin’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1967
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 110 Ohio App. 390 - Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Peroz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the action. * # * A plaintiff or defendant need not be interested in obtaining or defending against all the relief demanded. Judgments may be given for one or more of the plaintiffs according to their respective rights to relief * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.