Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Thorpe

9 Ohio App. 3d 1 - State v. Thorpe’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio (1996), 120 Ohio App. 3d 247 - State v. Hiatt (1997)

37 state decisions

1501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Santobello v. New York · State v. Kulig · 54 Ohio St. 2d 380 - State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'Connor · James W. Willett v. State of Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plea of no contest is not an admission of defendant’s guilt, but is an admission of the truth of the facts alleged in the indictment, information, or complaint and such plea or admission shall not be used against the defendant in any subsequent civil or criminal proceeding.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The trial court has clear authority in a felony case to determine whether the facts alleged in the indictment, information, or complaint are sufficient to justify conviction of the offense charged. If an indictment alleges facts sufficient to support a conviction, the trial court’s acceptance of a no contest plea requires a guilty finding. If not, the court may dismiss the charge or find the defendant guilty of a lesser included offense which is shown by those alleged facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.