9 Ohio App. 3d 184 - State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Fred D. Ewing, Sr. v. Norris W. McMackin (1986), 10 Ohio App. 3d 207 - State v. Crawford (1983)
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Wilkins · City of Dayton v. Rogers · State v. Solomon · 57 Ohio App. 2d 229 - State v. Stephens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) No person, without privilege to do so; (2) with purpose to prevent, obstruct or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within his official capacity; (3) shall do an act which hampers or impedes a public official in the performance of his lawful duties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(A) No person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for crime, or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, shall do any of the following: * * * (5) communicate false information to anyone.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““In those cases, [finding the evidence insufficient] the oral statements had no more effect on the performance of the police than silence or a refusal to answer would have had. In the instant case, however, the defendant sent the hotly pursuing officers in the wrong direction. We believe it is immaterial whether she did this by pushing them out the open side door, pointing m that direction, or stating that the felon had exited that door.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.