Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Ohio App. 3d 29 - Kleinfeld v. Link

9 Ohio App. 3d 29 - Kleinfeld v. Link’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
4
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Afram Export Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps Sa (1985), 16 Ohio App. 3d 476 - United Standard Management Corp. v. Mahoning Valley Solar Resources, Inc. (1984)

37 state decisions

16019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Shaffer v. Heitner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) established activity by nonresident in the forum state; “(2) nonresident takes advantage of privileges and benefits of forum state; “(3) nonresident solicits business through agents or advertising reasonably calculated to reach the forum state; “(4) it is foreseeable that nonresident will litigate in the forum state; and “(5) convenience to the litigants and fairness of requiring nonresident to come to the forum state.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “4. it is foreseeable that the non-resident will litigate in the forum state; and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.