9 Ohio App. 3d 52 - Warner v. Ctl Engineering, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2020
2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lessee of Perry v. Clarkson · Pfleger v. Renner · 115 Ohio App. 467 - Clover v. Columbus Retail Merchants Delivery, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order for a court to set aside an award on the ground of manifest mistake, it must appear that there is a mistake of such a character that the arbitrator would have corrected it himself, had it been called to his attention; permitting such a manifest mistake to stand ‘naturally works a fraud.’ [citation omitted] Thus, a mere error in judgment, or an erroneous conclusion of fact, will not constitute manifest mistake, [citation omitted].” * * * “In order for plaintiff to demonstrate manifest mistake in this case, then, he would have to establish that the arbitrator committed an error so patent and grave as would have required him to change his award.” 23”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.