Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ohio App. 3d 65

458 N.E.2d 414

State v. Hope

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1983

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1983-02-17

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2025

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-02-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pryatel, J.,

¶1 dissenting. With all respect, I dissent.

¶2 Where a defendant unlawfully (1) enters a locked automobile, (2) pries open the lock (shackling the steering wheel to the brake pedal), and (3) “pops off” (“removes”) the ignition switch preparatory to inserting a screwdriver therein to start the car to drive away, but then flees from the car upon the unexpected arrival of a third person (newspaper carrier), I hold that the defendant did “knowingly obtain or exert control over” the vehicle.

/9/ohioapp3d/65 · .json · Public domain