Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 855

State v. Swartz

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided July 1, 1896

Cuyahoga Circuit Court · decided 1896-07-01

<p>MARRIAGE.</p> <p>1. Evidence Establishing Common Raw Marriage.</p> <p>Evidence of cohabitation, recognition of children and the holding out of a woman as one’s wife is competent to establish a common law marriage.</p> <p>2. Such Marriage May be Made Basis eor Conviction on Charge oe Bigamy.</p> <p>Such a marriage is valid in Ohio and may be made the basis for a conviction on the charge of bigamy.</p> <p>8. A Marriage eor one Purpose is a Marriage eor all Purposes.</p> <p>There cannot be a marriage for one purpose that is not a marriage for all purposes of such contract.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1919

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1896-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The question whether there could be such a marriage arose in the case of J. W. Swartz, who was convicted of bigamy, on the basis of a common law marriage, in the criminal court pf Cuyahoga county.

¶2The circuit court upholds the decision of the lower court, and says that the evidence of cohabitation, recognition of children and the holding out of the woman as one’s wife is competent to establish a common law marriage, which is valid in Ohio, and as such may be the basis for the conviction on the charge of bigamy. The circuit court holds further that there cannct be a marriage for one purpose that is not a marriage for all purposes of that contract, and the statute says that a man who has one wife and marries another is guilty of bigamy.

/9/ohiocirdec/855 · .json · Public domain