Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Ohio Law. Abs. 436

Bogard v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1930

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1930-12-20

Decided 1930-12-20

HORNBECK, J.

¶1We believe that this motion is well taken. The decision on the demurrer was not a final order nor judgment as defined by 11583 GC, as it does not conclude the rights of the parties as to the whole case or as to any branch thereof.

¶2C. S. & C. R. R. Co. vs. Sloan, 31 Oh St 1,

¶3Teaff vs. Hewett, 1 Oh St 511,

¶4Longworth vs. McLally, 13 O. D. (Reprint) 2 Handy 131,

¶5Hobbs vs. Beckwith, 6 Oh St 252.

¶6The defendant might be acquitted of the immediate charge set up in the indictment, in which event he would be guilty of no offense, or he might be convicted of that charge and the proof be insufficient to show determination by conviction of two other offenses under the Crabbe Act.

¶7In view of our decision on the motion it will not be required that we discuss the action of the trial court on the plea in abatement.

Kunkle, P J, and Allread, J, concur.
/9/ohiolawabs/436 · .json · Public domain