9 Or. App. 220 - State v. Kraemer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"A Portland police officer, acting as an undercover agent, was introduced to defendant by a woman identified as Susan Bones. The first purchase was made for the officer through Susan. The officer was `swindled' in some fashion, however, and did not receive the purchase. "On the next occasion the officer approached defendant alone and defendant agreed to procure a tablet of the narcotic for $13. They drove to a particular location and parked. Defendant took the money, walked out of sight and then returned. He handed the officer the tablet, minus one-quarter of it. Defendant stated that he had obtained the drug from one Goldsworthy using the officer's money and taking a piece of the pill as his commission. Defendant stated this was his usual practice. "The officer testified as to a third transaction which was substantially identical to the second one. The third transaction formed the basis for the prosecution at bar." (Emphasis supplied).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 348 So. 2d 848 - Hill v. State

2. “We agree with the trial court's finding that defendant was a seller of the drug and not an agent of the purchaser. . . . He was acting in his own interests and charged a fee in the form of one-fourth of the narcotic tablet for his services. . . . Furthermore ORS 474.010(10) provides:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 348 So. 2d 848 - Hill v. State

3. “includes barter, exchange or offer therefor, and each such transaction made by any person, whether as principal, proprietor, agent, servant or employee.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 348 So. 2d 848 - Hill v. State