State v. DH’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Houston v. Hill · 115 Wash. 2d 171 - City of Spokane v. Douglass · 111 Wash. 2d 923 - City of Seattle v. Huff · State v. Alvarez · State v. Myers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) "Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated: (e) Exhibition of the genitals or unclothed pubic or rectal areas of any minor, or the unclothed breast of a female minor, for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“can be construed as modifying only the specified areas of the body that may not be exhibited. The unambiguous meaning of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“modified all the subsequent nouns, including the objects of all subsequent prepositional phrases in RCW 9.68A.011(3)(e). The defendant reasoned that the definition therefore encompasses not only conduct by”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stellman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.