State v. Noah’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 26 Cal. 4th 1013 - Golden Gateway v. Golden Gateway Tenants Ass'n (2001), Perricone v. Perricone (2009)
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shelley v. Kraemer · Flagg Brothers Inc v. Brooks J Lefkowitz · Frisby v. Schultz · Leila Jeanne Hill Audrey Himmelmann Everitt Simpsons v. Colorado · Walker v. City of Birmingham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) ... a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The course of conduct shall be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and shall actually cause substantial emotional distress .... (2) . . . “Course of conduct” includes . . . the sending of an electronic communication.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haines · State v. Askham“a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of `course of conduct'.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.