Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 Pa. Super. 404

Drum v. Uplinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1899

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1899-02-17

<p>Appeal, No. 34, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1897, No. 1106, discharging rule to strike off an appeal from award of arbitrators.'</p> <p>Assumpsit. Before Woodward, P. J.</p> <p>This case originally arose on appeal by defendant from the judgment of a justice for $284.20. The plaintiffs proceeded under the law to arbitration, and the case was regularly tried before arbitrators chosen by the parties for the trial of the case and same day an award was given in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant in the sum of $284.20 and costs. On May 25, 1898, the plaintiffs filed a bill of costs amounting to $22.00, being witnesses’ fees in the case. On June 6,1898, defendant appealed from the award of the arbitrators and on June 8 filed exceptions to the costs, paying in all costs excepted to less $22.00, plaintiffs’ bill of witnesses’ fees. A rule was then taken to strike off the appeal and on November 5 the rule to strike off the appeal was discharged on condition that defendant pay the amount of the plaintiffs’bill for witnesses, to wit: the $22.00 above referred to. Plaintiff excepted to the ruling of the court in discharging the rule to strike off the appeal from the award of arbitrators.</p> <p>Error assigned was in discharging rule to strike off the appeal from the award of the arbitrators.</p>

Relies on Samuel Cupples Wooden Ware Co. v. Howe · Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.

Affirmed · Decided 1899-02-17

Per Curiam,

¶1The refusal to strike off an appeal from an award of arbitrators is clearly an interlocutory order and from such orders there is no right of appeal before final judgment, unless it is expressly given by statute. This general rule has been enforced in a multitude of reported cases, and its application to orders like the present has been decided several times: Kendrick v. Overstreet, 3 S. & R. 357; Straub v. Smith, 2 S. & R. 382; Wooden Ware Co. v. Howe, 164 Pa. 85; Schultz v. Bear Creek Co., 174 Pa. 287; Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469; Anderson v. McMichael, 6 Pa. Superior Ct. 114.

¶2The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellants and the record remitted with a procedendo.

/9/pasuper/404 · .json · Public domain