Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Smith & H. 100 - State Ex Rel. v. Oliver

9 Smith & H. 100 - State Ex Rel. v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
December 1973
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 1973

6 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

10019311940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We can perceive no reason why a public use, or a public necessity, may not be common to Tennessee and to the United States, just as such a use or necessity may be common to the state and the county or to the state and the city. * * * 75”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.