Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 SO2D 818 - Murray v. Mengel Co.

Murray v. Mengel Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1975

14 state decisions

801942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nickelberry v. Ritchie Grocer Co. · 19 La. App. 173 - Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Co. · Ozbolt v. Weber-King Mfg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the exertion and straining in working cause such an elevation in the blood pressure of a person with hardened arteries as to cause the artery to rupture and result in a hemorrhage, this is an injury to the physical structure of the body and is such an unexpected and unforeseen occurrence as to constitute an accident within the meaning of the compensation law. It is now well established in our jurisprudence that, if excessive heat, heavy lifting or straining, although usual and customary, cause or contribute to a physical breakdown or accelerate its occurrence because of a pre-existing condition, the legal requirements are present to constitute an accident, and the injury is compensable. Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Co., 19 La. App. 173 , 138 So. 450 ; Ozbolt v. Weber-King Mfg. Co., La.App., 193 So. 383 ; Nickelberry v. Ritchie Grocer Co., 196 La. 1011 , 200 So. 330 ."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.