Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 SO3D 1 - State v. Jardines

State v. Jardines’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2023

10 state decisions

90200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Place · Nix v. Williams · United States v. Chadwick · United States v. Jacobsen · Harris v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]irst, a canine sniff is not a Fourth Amendment search; second, the officer and the dog were lawfully present at the defendant’s front door; and third, the evidence seized would inevitably have been discovered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.