9 So. 3d 1284 - Terrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · Nelson v. State · State v. Riechmann · 880 So. 2d 548 - Jacobs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a threshold matter, the state asserts that this claim was facially insufficient because the defendant did not name the expert whom he wished to testify. Although the defendant is usually required to identify fact witnesses by name, we are aware of no authority requiring the defendant to provide the name of a particular expert where the defendant claims that trial counsel failed to secure an expert in a named field of expertise. We thus do not agree that the defendant’s postconviction claim was facially insufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]ypically, it will be necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine why trial counsel did not call a particular witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.