Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 S.W.2d 737

Balo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1928

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1928-10-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1940

2 state decisions

Relies on 106 Tex. Crim. 146 - Courser v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CHRISTIAN, J.

¶1The offense is possession for the purpose of sale of malt liquor containing in excess of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

¶2Motion for new trial was overruled November 26, 1927, and notice of appeal was given on the same date. The time for filing statement of facts expired on February 24, 1928. The statement of facts was filed on February 25, 1928, which was 91 days from the date that notice of appeal was given. Under the provisions of article 760, C. C. P., we cannot consider the statement of facts. Courser v. State, 106 Tex. Cr. R. 146, 291 S. W. 236, and authorities cited.

¶3No bills of exception are brought forward.' No question is presented for review.

¶4The judgment is affirmed.

¶5PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been submitted to the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court

/9/sw2d/737 · .json · Public domain