Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 SW3D 170 - Gomes v. State

Gomes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2012

8 state decisions

5020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Riley v. State · Villanueva v. State · Brown v. State · Flores v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, docket sheet entries and other instruments found in the appellate record will not constitute substantial compliance with rule 40(b)(1). The reason for this is that, in most cases, the docket sheet is merely a record kept by the clerk showing the order and nature of the proceedings for each criminal action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Notice of Appeal Filed on Motion to Suppress Only”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.