Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 SW3D 234 - George v. State

George v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Carnley v. Cochran · Von Moltke v. Gillies · Webb v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the court must make an inquiry, evidenced by the record, which shows that the defendant has sufficient intelligence to demonstrate a capacity to waive his right to counsel and the ability to appreciate the practical disadvantage he will confront in representing himself. The court must determine not only that the defendant wishes to waive his right to counsel, but that he understands the consequences of such waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he trial judge must actively examine the defendant and the circumstances under which the waiver is made. Anything short of such an active pursuit into the intelligent and knowing aspects of the waiver will not meet the burden placed upon the court in such a situation. This must require the trial judge to do more than simply hand out a standardized “form waiver” to be read and signed by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.