Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

9 S.W.3d 616

State v. Duty

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1999

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1999-03-16

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2018

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant, Michael Duty, appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction on two counts of distributing a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo (1994). The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender to two concurrent terms of twelve years imprisonment. Defendant challenges the denial of his motion for disclosure of the state’s confidential informant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/9/sw3d/616 · .json · Public domain