Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Terry 45 - Maher v. Voss

Maher v. Voss’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2012

3 district · 8 state decisions

301953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co. · French v. Jeffries · Reardon v. Exchange Furniture Store, Inc. · Maher v. Voss · Carr v. Fox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think that a jury might reasonably find that the plaintiff, standing safely upon what appeared to be the floor óf a closet, was misled by appearances, with some justification, into believing that it was safe to step further. The appearance of the opening, the hanging of the coats, the platform beneath her feet, and the dimness (but not complete absence) of light— all these facts taken together might well lead reasonable men to reject the conclusion that Mrs. Maher was careless of her own safety.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There can be no liability of the possessor of the premises to a social guest if the danger is not on the portion of the premises to which he has been invited. The alleged duty to warn must therefore depend upon the existence of an invitation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.