Moss v. Riddle & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
9 U.S. 351 · 1809
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1959 · most notably Shappirio v. Goldberg (1904), Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. (1885)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dulany v. Hodgkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Fraud consists in intention, and that intention is a fact which ought to have been averred, for it is the gist of the plea, and would have been traversable.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. McKinnon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.