Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Va. App. 1 - Bosserman v. Bosserman

9 Va. App. 1 - Bosserman v. Bosserman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
6
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably 183 W. Va. 528 - Bettinger v. Bettinger (1990), Thomas C. Shooltz v. Jane Hoffman Shooltz (1998)

53 state decisions

2501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stern v. Stern · Hertz v. Hertz · Bowen v. Bowen · Butner v. . Spease · 5 Va. App. 238 - Brown v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the price established for buyout purposes ... is often artificial and does not always reflect true value.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The value of the stock of a closely held investment or real estate holding company, whether or not family owned, is closely related to the value of the assets underlying the stock. For companies of this type the appraiser should determine the fair market value of the assets of the company.... For these reasons, the adjusted net worth should be accorded greater weight in valuing the stock of a closely held investment or real estate holding company, whether or not family owned, than any other common yardsticks of appraisal, such as earnings or dividend paying capacity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.