Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Va. App. 11 - Commonwealth v. Holloway

9 Va. App. 11 - Commonwealth v. Holloway’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 12 Va. App. 1066 - Commonwealth v. Grimstead (1991), 14 Va. App. 487 - Hatcher v. Commonwealth (1992)

36 state decisions

1701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Sokolow · Kolender v. Lawson · Brown v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant’s failure to respond to the agent’s inquiry concerning ownership of the luggage need not be interpreted as abandonment. Having been advised by the agent that he was investigating for illegal drugs on board the train, the defendant, whose assertion of ownership may have been incriminating, chose to remain silent in the face of police questioning. He had a right to remain silent. Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 502 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1326 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983). The failure of other passengers in the vicinity to claim ownership is not evidence of the defendant’s abandonment of ownership nor is it evidence that the true owner had abandoned the luggage. The luggage was in a proper place for storage, and the owner may not have chosen to answer or been available when the agent inquired of passengers in the vicinity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity on the part of the defendant,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.