9 Va. App. 110 - Hudson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 1 Va. App. 241 - Sutphin v. Commonwealth · Ward v. Commonwealth · 3 Va. App. 152 - Glover v. Commonwealth · Glover v. Commonwealth · Glover v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Commonwealth ... is not obliged to enter into an agreement whereby it is precluded from putting on its evidence simply because the defendant is willing to make a qualified stipulation. The trial court correctly ruled that the Commonwealth was entitled to prove the indictment, and the evidence of [the defendant’s] prior conviction for robbery, was properly received for that purpose. [The defendant’s] willingness to stipulate does nothing to change that conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any person convicted of an offense under § 18.2-103, ... a third, or any subsequent offense, . . . shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.