Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 9 Va. App. 28 - Diehl v. Commonwealth

9 Va. App. 28 - Diehl v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. States · Missouri v. Lewis · Salsburg v. State of Maryland · Chandler v. Florida · Brown v. Lukhard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject at all times to the authority of the presiding judge to (i) control conduct of proceedings before the court, (ii) ensure decorum and prevent distractions, and (iii) ensure the fair administration of justice in the pending cause, electronic media and still photography coverage of public judicial proceedings in the appellate and trial courts of this state shall be allowed in accordance with standards of conduct and technology promulgated by the Supreme Court of Florida.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.